The Majority Judgment Voting Procedure: A Critical Evaluation
نویسندگان
چکیده
We evaluate critically some of the properties of theMajority Judgment voting procedure recently proposed by Balinski and Laraki (2007a, 2007b) for the election of one out of two or more candidates. The Majority Judgment Voting Procedure: A Critical Evaluation
منابع مشابه
The Majority Judgement Voting Procedure: A Critical Evaluation
We evaluate critically some of the properties of the Majority Judgement voting procedure recently proposed by Balinski and Laraki (2007a, 2007b) for the election of one out of two or more candidates.
متن کاملVoting Algorithm Based on Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System for Fault Tolerant Systems
some applications are critical and must designed Fault Tolerant System. Usually Voting Algorithm is one of the principle elements of a Fault Tolerant System. Two kinds of voting algorithm are used in most applications, they are majority voting algorithm and weighted average algorithm these algorithms have some problems. Majority confronts with the problem of threshold limits and voter of weight...
متن کاملVoting Algorithm Based on Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System for Fault Tolerant Systems
some applications are critical and must designed Fault Tolerant System. Usually Voting Algorithm is one of the principle elements of a Fault Tolerant System. Two kinds of voting algorithm are used in most applications, they are majority voting algorithm and weighted average algorithm these algorithms have some problems. Majority confronts with the problem of threshold limits and voter of weight...
متن کاملCollective Decision-Making without Paradoxes: An Argument-Based Account
The combination of individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a collective decision on the same propositions is called judgment aggregation. Literature in social choice and political theory has claimed that judgment aggregation raises serious concerns. For example, consider a set of premises and a conclusion in which the latter is logically equivalent to the former. When...
متن کاملA partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
The literature on judgment aggregation has now been moving from studying impossibility results regarding aggregation rules towards studying specific judgment aggregation rules. Here we focus on a family of rules that is the natural counterpart of the family of Condorcetconsistent voting rules: majority-preserving judgment aggregation rules. A judgment aggregation rule is majority-preserving if ...
متن کامل